Opinions and analysis keep rolling in, ahead of the ink analysis. The syntactical analysis would square with the odd looking hand of the text, which is worse than my Coptic hand. The Manchester Guardian posted another story yesterday on the basis of the work of Andrew Bernhard at gospels.net. This site actually consolidates quite a lot of information about this, including many prominent people coming out in favor of the forgery hypothesis. I confess, I already grow bored, it’s not an especially important little text, and Karen King’s article will not even appear until January 2013. We live in odd academic times.